In 2019, the World Boxing Council released its Code of Ethics. This served as a reminder for fighters and their teams to remember honor even amidst the intense action inside the ring. Posters were placed throughout the gym and digital copies were circulated online. It was a knock on the conscience, reminding everyone that “sublime art” requires sublime action. Now in 2024, the WBC referee has once again reminded everyone of the importance of fair play in the “sweet science”.
In a statement released by the WBC, it says it is important to comply with the following:With integrity and fair play as our mottos, we fight against all forms of discrimination both inside and outside the ring.This was recently successfully executed by one of the WBC judges. So what exactly happened and why was a particular judge praised by the WBC president?
WBC president impressed by his sincerity
advertisement
Article continues below this ad
A World Boxing Council (WBC) judge recently refused to appoint him to officiate the match. reason? A personal connection with one of our boxers. This seemingly simple act resonated deeply with the WBC and the organization's president. Mauricio Sulaiman He himself expressed his admiration on Twitter. Her fans also praised the judges' decision.
I'm very proud of the WBC referee who just declined the assignment to officiate a fight because he personally knows one of the fighters.
really exemplary— Mauricio Sulaiman (@wbcmoro) April 10, 2024
Sulaiman wrote:I am very proud of the WBC referee who just declined the appointment to officiate the match because he personally knows one of the fighters. It's really exemplary.”
Instant notification of the hottest information boxing Story via Google! Click “Follow” blue star
Please follow us
The judge's decision to recuse himself demonstrates an unflinching commitment to impartiality, even in the face of lucrative financial offers.
Additionally, this decision is consistent with the WBC's commitment to eradicating controversial decisions in the sport of boxing. In that regard, the WBC proposed that future undisputed heavyweight bouts include six judges instead of the customary three judges to avoid unfair scoring of rounds. .
WBC guarantees new scoring system for Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk
advertisement
Article continues below this ad
The upcoming heavyweight showdown will be Tyson Fury and Oleksandr Usyk A historic change may occur in the way battles are judged. World Boxing Council (WBC) president Mauricio Sulaiman is pushing for a six-person referee panel for the mega-fight, a move that has the boxing world excited. Sulaiman is not shy about expressing his dissatisfaction with the current three-judge system.
he said boxing scene,”If a match takes place when both judges are off, the match will be decided 2-1 on bad cards. If it happened with him six judges, the correct fighter would win him 4-2. There have been too many split decision and majority vote fights in recent months. This is not OK.Controversial scorecards have plagued recent bouts, leaving fans and fighters alike questioning the legitimacy of wins.
advertisement
Article continues below this ad
Sulaiman is focusing more on litigation and believes a six-judge panel would minimize the impact of a judge taking a night off. What do you think about introducing a six-man panel to combat controversial calls in boxing? Let us know in the comments section.